Ressources
Sites web
Calculateur de CO2 (chauffage, électricité, transport): http://www.compensationco2.ca/calcul-emissions-co2/
Calculateur de CO2 (transport) https://calculateurco2.org/
Initiative québécoise, site très complet:
http://carboneboreal.uqac.ca/calculateur-ges-fr/
Organismes amis des arbres
Articles scientifiques pertinents
[1] Conway TM, Urbani L. Variations in municipal urban forestry policies: A case study of Toronto, Canada. Urban For Urban Green 2007;6:181–92. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.003.
[2] Johnston M. A Brief History Of Urban Forestry In The United States. Arboric J 1996;20:257–78. doi:10.1080/03071375.1996.9747122.
[3] Bühler O, Kristoffersen P, Larsen SU. Growth of street trees in Copenhagen with emphasis on the effect of different establishment concepts. Arboric Urban For 2007;33:330–7.
[4] Schroeder H, Flannigan J, Coles R. Resident’s attitudes toward street trees in the UK and U.S. communities. Arboric Urban For 2006;32:236–46.
[5] Konijnendijk CC, Ricard RM, Kenney A, Randrup TB. Defining urban forestry – A comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban For Urban Green 2006;4:93–103. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2005.11.003.
[6] McPherson EG. Monitoring million trees LA: Tree performance during the early years and future benefits. Arboric Urban For 2014;40:286–301.
[7] Ordóñez C, Duinker PN. An analysis of urban forest management plans in Canada: Implications for urban forest management. Landsc Urban Plan 2013;116:36–47. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.007.
[8] Deaton BJ, Vyn RJ. The effect of strict agricultural zoning on agricultural land values: The case of Ontario’s Greenbelt. Am J Agric Econ 2010;92:941–55. doi:10.1093/ajae/aap022.
[9] Mackenzie BF. Supporting environmental stewardship and livelihood benefits in Ontario’s greenbelt: Assessing the potential contribution of the Alternative Land Use Services program. University of Waterloo (Canada), 2009.
[10] Mittelstaedt M. Ontario’s greenbelt a model for the world. Globe Mail 2008:A.9.
[11] Revéret J-P, Dupras J. Nature et économie : un regard sur les écosystèmes du Québec 2015:xxiv, 288 pages.
[12] Davis KL, Jones RE. Modeling Environmental Concern for Urban Tree Protection Using Biophysical and Social Psychological Indicators. Soc Nat Resour 2014;27:372–88. doi:10.1080/08941920.2013.861555.
[13] Krajter Ostoić S, Konijnendijk van den Bosch CC. Exploring global scientific discourses on urban forestry. Urban For Urban Green 2015;14:129–38. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.01.001.
[14] Roy S, Byrne J, Pickering C. A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban For Urban Green 2012;11:351–63. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006.
[15] Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Hoehn RE, Walton JT, Bond J. A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboric. Urban For., vol. 34, 2008, p. 347–58.
[16] Cowett FD. Methodology for spatial analysis of municipal street tree benefits. Arboric Urban For 2014;40:112–8.
[17] Elmendorf W. The importance of trees and nature in community: A review of the relative literature. Arboric Urban For 2008;34:152–6.
[18] Shanahan DF, Lin BB, Bush R, Gaston KJ, Dean JH, Barber E, et al. Toward improved public health outcomes from urban nature. Am J Public Health 2015;105:470–7. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302324.
[19] Beyer KMM, Kaltenbach A, Szabo A, Bogar S, Nieto FJ, Malecki KM. Exposure to neighborhood green space and mental health: evidence from the survey of the health of Wisconsin. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014;11:3453–72. doi:10.3390/ijerph110303453.
[20] Manusset S. Les espaces verts : Un nouvel outil des politiques de santé publique ? Environnement, Risques et Sante 2015;14:313–20. doi:10.1684/ers.2015.0795.
[21] Williams K, O’Brien L, Stewart A. Urban health and urban forestry: How can forest management agencies help? Arboric J 2013;35:119–33. doi:10.1080/03071375.2013.852358.
[22] Fryd O. The role of urban green space and trees in relation to climate change. CAB Rev Perspect Agric Vet Sci Nutr Nat Resour 2011;6. doi:10.1079/PAVSNNR20116053.
[23] Inkiläinen ENM, McHale MR, Blank GB, James AL, Nikinmaa E. The role of the residential urban forest in regulating throughfall: A case study in Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 2013;119:91–103. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.07.002.
[24] Carlyle-Moses DE, Schooling JT. Tree traits and meteorological factors influencing the initiation and rate of stemflow from isolated deciduous trees. Hydrol Process 2015:n/a – n/a. doi:10.1002/hyp.10519.
[25] Ellis JB. Sustainable surface water management and green infrastructure in UK urban catchment planning. J Environ Plan Manag 2013;56:24–41. doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.648752.
[26] Wolf KL, Robbins AST. Metro nature, environmental health, and economic value. Environ Health Perspect 2015;123:390–8. doi:10.1289/ehp.1408216.
[27] Zhou W, Qian Y, Li X, Li W, Han L. Relationships between land cover and the surface urban heat island: seasonal variability and effects of spatial and thematic resolution of land cover data on predicting land surface temperatures. Landsc Ecol 2013;29:153–67. doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9950-5.
[28] Rogan J, Ziemer M, Martin D, Ratick S, Cuba N, DeLauer V. The impact of tree cover loss on land surface temperature: A case study of central Massachusetts using Landsat Thematic Mapper thermal data. Appl Geogr 2013;45:49–57. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.004.
[29] Touchaei AG, Wang Y. Characterizing urban heat island in Montreal (Canada)—Effect of urban morphology. Sustain Cities Soc 2015. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2015.03.005.
[30] Xie M, Gao Y, Cao Y, Breuste J, Fu M, Tong D. Dynamics and Temperature Regulation Function of Urban Green Connectivity. J Urban Plan Dev 2015;141:A5014008. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000266.
[31] Berland A, Manson SM. Patterns in Residential Urban Forest Structure Along a Synthetic Urbanization Gradient. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2013;103:749–63. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.782598.
[32] Escobedo FJ, Kroeger T, Wagner JE. Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ Pollut 2011;159:2078–87. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.010.
[33] Alam M, Olivier A, Paquette A, Dupras J, Revéret J-P, Messier C. A general framework for the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services of tree-based intercropping systems. Agrofor Syst 2014;88:679–91. doi:10.1007/s10457-014-9681-x.
[34] Duinker P, Ordóñez C, Steenberg J, Miller K, Toni S, Nitoslawski S. Trees in Canadian Cities: Indispensable Life Form for Urban Sustainability. Sustainability 2015;7:7379–96. doi:10.3390/su7067379.
[35] Dupras J, Alam M. Urban Sprawl and Ecosystem Services: A Half Century Perspective in the Montreal Area (Quebec, Canada). J Environ Policy Plan 2014;17:180–200. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2014.927755.
[36] Communauté Métropolitaire de Montréal. La trame verte et bleue 2011. http://cmm.qc.ca/fileadmin/user_upload/pmad2012/documentation/20130228_fascicule_trameVerteBleue.pdf (accessed October 10, 2015).
[37] Ville de Montréal D des grands parcs et du verdissement. Plan d’action canopée 2012-2021. Montréal: 2012.
[38] Herms DA, McCullough DG. Emerald ash borer invasion of North America: history, biology, ecology, impacts, and management. Annu Rev Entomol 2014;59:13–30. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162051.
[39] Fissore C, McFadden JP, Nelson KC, Peters EB, Hobbie SE, King JY, et al. Potential impacts of emerald ash borer invasion on biogeochemical and water cycling in residential landscapes across a metropolitan region. Urban Ecosyst 2012;15:1015–30. doi:10.1007/s11252-012-0239-2.
[40] Siegert NW, Mercader RJ, McCullough DG. Spread and dispersal of emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae): estimating the spatial dynamics of a difficult-to-detect invasive forest pest. Can Entomol 2015;147:338–48. doi:10.4039/tce.2015.11.
[41] Nock CA, Taugourdeau O, Work T, Messier C, Kneeshaw D. Urban forests on the front line. Science 2014;343:249. doi:10.1126/science.343.6168.249-a.
[42] Larson LR, Stedman RC, Cooper CB, Decker DJ. Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol 2015;43:112–24. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.004.
[43] Pincetl S, Gillespie T, Pataki DE, Saatchi S, Saphores J-D. Urban tree planting programs, function or fashion? Los Angeles and urban tree planting campaigns. GeoJournal 2012;78:475–93. doi:10.1007/s10708-012-9446-x.
[44] Pincetl S, Prabhu SS, Gillespie TW, Jenerette GD, Pataki DE. The evolution of tree nursery offerings in Los Angeles County over the last 110 years. Landsc Urban Plan 2013;118:10–7. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.05.002.
[45] Dupras J, Drouin C, André P, Gonzalez A. Towards the Establishment of a Green Infrastructure in the Region of Montreal (Quebec, Canada). Plan Pract Res 2015;30:355–75. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1058073.
[46] Moskell C, Allred SB. Residents’ beliefs about responsibility for the stewardship of park trees and street trees in New York City. Landsc Urban Plan 2013;120:85–95. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.08.002.
[47] De Souza ML. Social movements as “critical urban planning” agents. City 2006;10:327–42. doi:10.1080/13604810600982347.
[48] Connolly JJT, Svendsen ES, Fisher DR, Campbell LK. Networked governance and the management of ecosystem services: The case of urban environmental stewardship in New York City. Ecosyst Serv 2014;10:187–94. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.005.
[49] Weng Y-C. Contrasting visions of science in ecological restoration: Expert-lay dynamics between professional practitioners and volunteers. Geoforum 2015;65:134–45. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.023.
[50] Law J, Hassard J. Actor network theory and after. 1999.
[51] Akrich M. Comment décrire les objets techniques. Tech Cult 1987;9:49–64.
[52] Callon M, Lascoumes P, Barthe Y. Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique. 2001.
[53] Callon M. Actor-Network Theory: The market test. Actor Netw Theory after 1999:181–95.
[54] Akrich M, Callon M, Latour B. Sociologie de la traduction: textes fondateurs. Presses de l’Ecole des Mines; 2006.
[55] Akrich M. Les utilisateurs, acteurs de l’innovation. Educ Perm N° 134 1998;N° 134:p.79–89.
[56] Latour B. Politics of nature: East and West perspectives. Ethics Glob Polit 2011;4:71–80. doi:10.3402/egp.v4i1.6373.
[57] Latour B. Networks, societies, spheres: Reflections of an actor-network theorist. Int J Commun 2011;5:796–810.
[58] Hodson M, Marvin S. Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Res Policy 2010;39:477–85. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020.
[60] Wilbanks TJ, Kates RW. Global change in local places: How scale matters. Clim Change 1999;43:601–28. doi:10.1023/A:1005418924748.
[61] Pincetl S. Implementing municipal tree planting: Los Angeles million-tree initiative. Environ Manage 2010;45:227–38. doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9412-7.
[62] Pincetl S, Gillespie T, Pataki DE, Saatchi S, Saphores JD. Urban tree planting programs, function or fashion? Los Angeles and urban tree planting campaigns. GeoJournal 2013;78:475–93. doi:10.1007/s10708-012-9446-x.
[63] Dilley J, Wolf KL. Homeowner interactions with residential trees in urban areas. Arboric Urban For 2013;39:267–77.
[64] Pincetl S. From the sanitary city to the sustainable city: challenges to institutionalising biogenic (nature’s services) infrastructure. Local Environ 2010;15:43–58. doi:10.1080/13549830903406065.
[65] Bailly E. Des espaces publics aux espaces paysagers de la ville durable. Articulo 2013. doi:10.4000/articulo.2233.
[66] Deng Y, Cai L, Li XL. Dynamic Integrated Planning System Based on Landscape Urbanism: An Approach of Sustainable Urban Landscape Planning. Adv Mater Res 2011;368-373:1895–901. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.368-373.1895.
[67] Jorgensen A. Beyond the view: Future directions in landscape aesthetics research. Landsc Urban Plan 2011;100:353–5. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.023.
[68] Langhorst J. Re-presenting transgressive ecologies: post-industrial sites as contested terrains. Local Environ 2014;19:1110–33. doi:10.1080/13549839.2014.928813.
[69] Celio E, Ott M, Sirén E, Grêt-Regamey A. A prototypical tool for normative landscape scenario development and the analysis of actors’ policy preferences. Landsc Urban Plan 2015;137:40–53. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.013.
[70] Schwarz K, Fragkias M, Boone CG, Zhou W, McHale M, Grove JM, et al. Trees grow on money: urban tree canopy cover and environmental justice. PLoS One 2015;10:e0122051. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122051.
[71] Nielsen AB, Jensen RB. Some visual aspects of planting design and silviculture across contemporary forest management paradigms – Perspectives for urban afforestation. Urban For Urban Green 2007;6:143–58. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2006.12.002.
[77] De Souza ML. Social movements as “critical urban planning” agents. City 2006;10:327–42. doi:10.1080/13604810600982347.
[78] Arnstein SR. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. J Am Inst Plann 1969;35:216–24. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225.
[79] Aylett A. Participatory planning, justice, and climate change in Durban, South Africa. Environ Plan A 2010;42:99–115. doi:10.1068/a4274.
[80] Marafa LM. Socio-ecological impact and risk assessments in the urban environment: A multidisciplinary concept from Hong Kong. Environmentalist 2002;22:377–85. doi:10.1023/A:1020723132203.
[81] Sabel C, Fung A, Karkkainen B. Beyond backyard environmentalism: How communities are quietly refashioning environmental regulation. Debating Earth, L Sea n.d.
[82] Truffer B, Coenen L. Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies. Reg Stud 2012;46:1–21. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.646164.
[83] Wallis PJ, Lison R. Institutional change in multi-scalar water governance regimes: A case from Victoria, Australia. J Water Law 2011;22:85–94.
[84] Awaluddin M. The Partnership Between Business and Government towards Sustainable City Development. 2014 Int. Conf. ICT Smart Soc., IEEE; 2014, p. 131–8. doi:10.1109/ICTSS.2014.7013162.
[85] Aylett A. Networked Urban Climate Governance: Neighbourhood Scale Residential SolarSystems and the Example of Solarize Portland. Environ Plan C 2013.